Insurance Broker Services for TenneT

The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

The tender includes a price sheet as an attachment. The bidder submits the prices on the price sheet. The formats are fixed and the same for all bidders. Under this award criterion, the total price is evaluated. This is indicated as a total on the price sheet. The bid with the lowest bid price (= “best price”) receives the full points for this criterion. The bid prices of the remaining bids are linearly interpolated and compared to the lowest bid price. Bid prices that exceed the threshold of 200% of the lowest bid price are awarded 0 points.

Evaluation of Methodology and scope of work, including team, broking + market access, policy management, claims management. Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.

Evaluation of reporting, KPI, transition and SLA Within the qualitative award criteria, a comparative evaluation of the bidder’s quality and expertise is conducted. The individual (sub)criteria are evaluated on a scale of 0 to 10 points, taking into account all relevant statements and supporting documentation submitted, with 10 points representing the best rating and 0 points the worst: • 9 to 10 points: very high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements to a particularly high degree • 7 to 8 points: high degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid meets the requirements and indicates that services will be provided properly • 5 to 6 points: moderate degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid contains deficiencies • 3 to 4 points: low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. • 0 to 2 points: very low degree of target fulfillment: if the information in the bid exhibits very significant deficiencies and does not indicate that services will be provided properly. Minimum quality requirements: Taking into account the complexity and criticality of the services to be procured, TenneT requests a minimum threshold of 5 points for the individual qualitative criteria. For tenders that receive a score of less than 5 points in any individual qualitative award criterion, TenneT holds the right to exclude the bidder from further participation in the procurement procedure.